手机测评现状、问题与对策分析

随着智能手机快速更新换代,手机测评已成为引导消费者快速全面地了解手机性能和功能的有效载体.本文对手机测评的环境、技术、传播方式、传播内容、测评者情况进行分析,指出手机测评面临的问题,并提出相应对策.     

DX桩承力盘破坏机理研究

由于施工工艺的限制,DX桩承力盘范围内没有配置钢筋,承力盘为素混凝土结构,因此,在进行DX桩设计时,必须对承力盘进行抗剪强度验算.根据现有混凝土结构设计规范中规定的公式计算出的结果偏于保守,当盘端阻力达到一定值时,承力盘先发生剪切破坏,因而,承载盘的存在对桩基竖向抗压承载力并没有大幅提升作用,但经过多次现场静载荷试验证明,DX桩相比于同直径、同桩长的普通直孔桩,其竖向抗压承载力会有明显提升,因此,承力盘发挥的作用是非常明显的.鉴于上述理论计算与工程实践的差异,本文通过理论分析方法对DX桩承力盘的受力机理进行了深入的分析,并采用FLAC3D有限差分软件对承力盘底面的土体反力分布形式进行了研究,可以发现DX桩承力盘范围内的应力分布与承力盘尖角密切相关,且承力盘底面的土体反力呈抛物线形式分布.     

新能源电厂并网全过程标准化管理

规范新能源电厂并网流程管理,避免因管理不善而造成的并网延误,践行"四个服务"的理念,在确保电网安全、优质、经济运行的基础上最大限度地保障发、供、用三方的合法权益,提升优质服务水平.     

经济政策不确定性与企业员工配置——来自沪深上市公司的经验证据

企业员工配置是企业内部管理的重要一环,经济政策不确定性是否会影响企业员工配置?本文以员工数量衡量企业员工配置,利用2010-2018年沪深A股上市企业数据和经济政策不确定性指数建立面板数据模型,考察经济政策不确定性对企业员工配置的影响,实证研究发现:经济政策不确定性会显著增加企业员工配置,且该影响经更换变量、调整样本容量以及内生性处理后依旧显著,该反应在还债能力较弱、盈利能力较差、股权制衡度较高、地区经济发展水平较低的企业中更为明显。文章的研究结论对于企业管理和宏观经济管控有一定的参考价值。     

产学研合作创新绩效影响因素元分析研究

为探寻中国产学研合作创新绩效影响因素，挖掘促进中国产学研深度融合的发力点,运用元分析方法，对中国国内与产学研合作创新绩效影响因素相关文献进行再分析，结果发现：①企业层面的企业规模、企业知识吸收能力、企业研发人员投入与企业研发经费投入，组织间层面的知识协同性、知识转移能力、信息沟通渠道及合作紧密度，政府层面的政策支持与经费支持，区域层面的法律法规完善性与经济发展水平均能够显著提升产学研合作创新绩效；②区位因素、数据类型分别对产学研合作创新绩效与企业规模、政府经费资助关系具有显著调节作用。     

乡村旅游开发下农户生计适应变化与影响机理研究*——以延安市乡村旅游为例

［目的］以延安市3个典型乡村旅游地为例，结合可持续生计分析框架和适应性理论，分析农户在乡村旅游扰动下的适应策略与适应模式，定量测度不同适应模式农户的适应结果。厘清农户未来生计策略选择的影响因素及其机制，提出促进农户及乡村旅游地可持续发展的对策。［方法］通过参与性农户评估法及二元回归分析法分析影响农户未来生计策略选择的因素。［结果］（1）旅游开发造成案例地农户自然资本丧失，失地农户由务农或务工为主的单一适应方式向兼业型与非农型转变，分化为4种不同类型的农户，且各类农户在各描述指标方面差异显著。（2）农户的生计资本衡量3个社区旅游开发后的适应结果，生计资本普遍较低且内部各维度差异明显。对比4类农户适应结果可得：复合生计型>务工主导型>旅游服务型>社会保障型。（3）通过二元逻辑回归模型深入解释当下适应结果对农户未来生计策略选择的影响，物质资本、金融资本和社会资本均影响农户选择意愿，其中可借款人数是最关键的影响变量。［结论］农户在旅游开发背景下生计动态适应的影响机制为旅游开发及基于此补偿制度是农户现在生计适应活动的外部起因，按照适应类型以及收入比重，分化为4种模式农户； 现行生计适应策略使农户适应结果迥异，生计资本的储量和结构差异显著，这种差异是农户未来生计选择的直接动因； 3个社区不同类型的旅游开发模式是农户未来生计策略选择分异的推动力量。     

科技型中小企业创新生态系统构建机制研究

文章在阐述科技型中小企业创新生态系统概念及构成要素的基础上,提出了由动力机制、知识转移与共享机制、利益协调机制和外部治理机制组成的科技型中小企业创新生态系统构建机制理论框架.通过对长三角地区200家科技型中小企业的问卷调查,分析了上述四大机制的影响作用,并根据调查结果进一步提出,要有效弥补科技型中小企业创新资源不足、打造线上线下相结合的知识共享平台、建立合理的利益分配机制、加强政府对创新生态系统建立的支持与引导、建立更加专业的科技中介服务体系,从而推进并完善科技型中小企业创新生态系统构建.     

Rewriting China’s Recent History: Fluctuations in State Economic Control, 1949–1984

China's political and economic systems are often discussed in combination. It is generally believed that under the political system of centralization, the economic system had to be a state monopoly. This article challenges that view by providing an economic perspective. The period 1949–1984 is selected to explore the causes of successive periods of strengthening and weakening of the state's monopoly power over the economy. Scholars have generally assumed that the period of state monopoly originated from socialist ideology or the personal will of the leaders. But economic conditions severely limited the options available. After the new China was established, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) did not try to create a fully socialist economy in the short run. Instead, the CCP formulated a New Democracy platform that pragmatically allowed many types of enterprise to function side by side, including private industry, household ventures, and state‐owned enterprises. The original plan of the CCP was to allow private enterprise to develop in order to build up capital to rebuild the war‐damaged economy so that a strong foundation could be established for creating a socialist economy. But the Korean War from 1950 to 1953 and an influx of Soviet capital caused a shift from a mixed economy to state capitalism by 1956. From that point on, Mao Zedong and other Chinese leaders had to change course again and again as fiscal crises limited available options. A reversal occurred in 1958 when the Soviets withdrew both their advisors and their capital subsidies, leaving the state capitalist system weakened. The crisis in the Chinese economy from 1959 to 1961 required decentralization of economic authority and efforts to promote rural capital formation. The next shift occurred after 1963 as the economy was organized to prepare for a possible military invasion. The required mobilization of industrial resources in remote regions of China inevitably reinforced state management of the economy. The final reversal occurred in the late 1970s, when imports of Western technology and equipment created another fiscal crisis for the central government, which then had to shift the burden of capital formation from the state to private entities. The reform of the rural household contract system, the adjustment of economic structures, and an increase in exports to gain foreign exchange all took place as part of “de‐monopolization” reforms. The reforms that occurred after 1979 were not an aberration or a radical break from the past. They were part of a pattern that evolved from 1949 to 1984, with fluctuations dependent on the weakening and strengthening status of state finances. The shifts that occurred during this period have either been ignored by observers, or they have been misinterpreted as being motivated by ideology. In fact, new policies were created to enable the government to adjust to changes in the internal and external environment.     

The Moderating Effects of Status-Consumption Motive and Age in the Relationship between CSR Advertising Appeal Type and Purchase Intentions

The primary purpose of this study was to examine factors that influence the effectiveness of benefit appeal types (i.e., help-other vs. help-self) in Corporate Social Responsibility advertising. To that end, we designed and administered a between-subjects experiment where participants viewed one of the two CSR advertisements crafted with help-self and help-other benefit appeals. Results provided evidence supporting the moderating effects of status-consumption motives and age on purchasing intentions. Additional analysis suggested consumers younger than 48 years old were more likely to be persuaded by a help-other ad appeal when they didn't have strong desires for status consumption. Results were discussed in light of the self-concept theory and value-expressive framework in CSR advertising.